[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250411074958.2858496-3-cratiu@nvidia.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 10:49:54 +0300
From: Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@...dia.com>
To: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <cratiu@...dia.com>
CC: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>, Jay Vosburgh <jv@...sburgh.net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S . Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski
<kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Nikolay Aleksandrov
<razor@...ckwall.org>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Saeed Mahameed
<saeedm@...dia.com>, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>, Jianbo Liu
<jianbol@...dia.com>, Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, Ayush Sawal
<ayush.sawal@...lsio.com>, Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>, "Przemek
Kitszel" <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>, Sunil Goutham
<sgoutham@...vell.com>, Geetha sowjanya <gakula@...vell.com>, Subbaraya
Sundeep <sbhatta@...vell.com>, hariprasad <hkelam@...vell.com>, Bharat
Bhushan <bbhushan2@...vell.com>, Louis Peens <louis.peens@...igine.com>,
"Leon Romanovsky" <leonro@...dia.com>, <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v3 2/6] xfrm: Use xdo.dev instead of xdo.real_dev
The policy offload struct was reused from the state offload and
real_dev was copied from dev, but it was never set to anything else.
Simplify the code by always using xdo.dev for policies.
Signed-off-by: Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@...dia.com>
Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec.c | 2 +-
net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c | 2 --
net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c | 2 --
3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec.c
index 626e525c0f0d..0dfbbe21936f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec.c
@@ -1164,7 +1164,7 @@ mlx5e_ipsec_build_accel_pol_attrs(struct mlx5e_ipsec_pol_entry *pol_entry,
static int mlx5e_xfrm_add_policy(struct xfrm_policy *x,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
{
- struct net_device *netdev = x->xdo.real_dev;
+ struct net_device *netdev = x->xdo.dev;
struct mlx5e_ipsec_pol_entry *pol_entry;
struct mlx5e_priv *priv;
int err;
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c
index d62f76161d83..4f4165ff738d 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c
@@ -378,7 +378,6 @@ int xfrm_dev_policy_add(struct net *net, struct xfrm_policy *xp,
xdo->dev = dev;
netdev_tracker_alloc(dev, &xdo->dev_tracker, GFP_ATOMIC);
- xdo->real_dev = dev;
xdo->type = XFRM_DEV_OFFLOAD_PACKET;
switch (dir) {
case XFRM_POLICY_IN:
@@ -400,7 +399,6 @@ int xfrm_dev_policy_add(struct net *net, struct xfrm_policy *xp,
err = dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_policy_add(xp, extack);
if (err) {
xdo->dev = NULL;
- xdo->real_dev = NULL;
xdo->type = XFRM_DEV_OFFLOAD_UNSPECIFIED;
xdo->dir = 0;
netdev_put(dev, &xdo->dev_tracker);
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
index d896c3fefb07..33d1f5679e8b 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
@@ -1555,7 +1555,6 @@ xfrm_state_find(const xfrm_address_t *daddr, const xfrm_address_t *saddr,
xso->type = XFRM_DEV_OFFLOAD_PACKET;
xso->dir = xdo->dir;
xso->dev = xdo->dev;
- xso->real_dev = xdo->real_dev;
xso->flags = XFRM_DEV_OFFLOAD_FLAG_ACQ;
netdev_hold(xso->dev, &xso->dev_tracker, GFP_ATOMIC);
error = xso->dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_add(x, NULL);
@@ -1563,7 +1562,6 @@ xfrm_state_find(const xfrm_address_t *daddr, const xfrm_address_t *saddr,
xso->dir = 0;
netdev_put(xso->dev, &xso->dev_tracker);
xso->dev = NULL;
- xso->real_dev = NULL;
xso->type = XFRM_DEV_OFFLOAD_UNSPECIFIED;
x->km.state = XFRM_STATE_DEAD;
to_put = x;
--
2.45.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists