netdev - Re: [PATCH v13 06/22] sfc: make regs setup with checking and set media ready

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250415142512.00004edd@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 14:25:12 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
To: <alejandro.lucero-palau@....com>
CC: <linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<dan.j.williams@...el.com>, <edward.cree@....com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
	<kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	<dave.jiang@...el.com>, Alejandro Lucero <alucerop@....com>, Martin Habets
	<habetsm.xilinx@...il.com>, Zhi Wang <zhi@...dia.com>, Edward Cree
	<ecree.xilinx@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 06/22] sfc: make regs setup with checking and set
 media ready

On Mon, 14 Apr 2025 16:13:20 +0100
<alejandro.lucero-palau@....com> wrote:

> From: Alejandro Lucero <alucerop@....com>
> 
> Use cxl code for registers discovery and mapping.
> 
> Validate capabilities found based on those registers against expected
> capabilities.
> 
> Set media ready explicitly as there is no means for doing so without
> a mailbox and without the related cxl register, not mandatory for type2.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alejandro Lucero <alucerop@....com>
> Reviewed-by: Martin Habets <habetsm.xilinx@...il.com>
> Reviewed-by: Zhi Wang <zhi@...dia.com>
> Acked-by: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_cxl.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_cxl.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_cxl.c
> index 753d5b7d49b6..885b46c6bd5a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_cxl.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_cxl.c
> @@ -21,8 +21,11 @@ int efx_cxl_init(struct efx_probe_data *probe_data)
>  {
>  	struct efx_nic *efx = &probe_data->efx;
>  	struct pci_dev *pci_dev = efx->pci_dev;
> +	DECLARE_BITMAP(expected, CXL_MAX_CAPS);

Can do the = {} trick to avoid explicit clear below.

> +	DECLARE_BITMAP(found, CXL_MAX_CAPS);

I'm not immediately able to find where found is initialized.

>  	struct efx_cxl *cxl;
>  	u16 dvsec;
> +	int rc;
>  
>  	probe_data->cxl_pio_initialised = false;
>  
> @@ -43,6 +46,31 @@ int efx_cxl_init(struct efx_probe_data *probe_data)
>  	if (!cxl)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> +	bitmap_clear(expected, 0, CXL_MAX_CAPS);
> +	set_bit(CXL_DEV_CAP_HDM, expected);
> +	set_bit(CXL_DEV_CAP_HDM, expected);
> +	set_bit(CXL_DEV_CAP_RAS, expected);
> +
> +	rc = cxl_pci_accel_setup_regs(pci_dev, &cxl->cxlds, found);
> +	if (rc) {
> +		pci_err(pci_dev, "CXL accel setup regs failed");
> +		return rc;
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Checking mandatory caps are there as, at least, a subset of those
> +	 * found.
> +	 */
> +	if (cxl_check_caps(pci_dev, expected, found))
> +		return -ENXIO;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Set media ready explicitly as there are neither mailbox for checking
> +	 * this state nor the CXL register involved, both no mandatory for

not mandatory

> +	 * type2.
> +	 */
> +	cxl->cxlds.media_ready = true;
> +
>  	probe_data->cxl = cxl;
>  
>  	return 0;