[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <def2c29d-3226-4a64-a7d5-6e03c8d26804@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 11:21:31 +0200
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 net-next 07/14] ipv6: Preallocate
rt->fib6_nh->rt6i_pcpu in ip6_route_info_create().
On 4/14/25 8:14 PM, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
> index ce060b59d41a..404da01a7502 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/route.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
> @@ -3664,10 +3664,12 @@ int fib6_nh_init(struct net *net, struct fib6_nh *fib6_nh,
> goto out;
>
> pcpu_alloc:
> - fib6_nh->rt6i_pcpu = alloc_percpu_gfp(struct rt6_info *, gfp_flags);
> if (!fib6_nh->rt6i_pcpu) {
> - err = -ENOMEM;
> - goto out;
> + fib6_nh->rt6i_pcpu = alloc_percpu_gfp(struct rt6_info *, gfp_flags);
'rt6i_pcpu' has just been pre-allocated, why we need to try again the
allocation here? And if it's really needed why don't rename the new
helper to something more generic and re-use it here?
Thanks,
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists