[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z_-P_1iLDWksH1ik@stanley.mountain>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 14:09:51 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@...istor.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next] rxrpc: rxgk: Set error code in
rxgk_yfs_decode_ticket()
Propagate the error code if key_alloc() fails. Don't return
success.
Fixes: 9d1d2b59341f ("rxrpc: rxgk: Implement the yfs-rxgk security class (GSSAPI)")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
---
It's not totally clear if these patch prefixes are real things or just
a cat walking across the keyboard. "rxrxpc: gk: yfs-rxgk" Really?
We expect people to believe these are real?
---
net/rxrpc/rxgk_app.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/rxgk_app.c b/net/rxrpc/rxgk_app.c
index 6206a84395b8..b94b77a1c317 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/rxgk_app.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/rxgk_app.c
@@ -141,6 +141,7 @@ int rxgk_yfs_decode_ticket(struct rxrpc_connection *conn, struct sk_buff *skb,
KEY_ALLOC_NOT_IN_QUOTA, NULL);
if (IS_ERR(key)) {
_leave(" = -ENOMEM [alloc %ld]", PTR_ERR(key));
+ ret = PTR_ERR(key);
goto error;
}
--
2.47.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists