[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z__U2O2xetryAK_E@ryzen>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 18:03:36 +0200
From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@...nel.org>
To: Krishna Chaitanya Chundru <krishna.chundru@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, nic_swsd@...ltek.com,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] r8169: do not call rtl8169_down() twice on shutdown
Hello Krishna Chaitanya,
On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 09:15:19PM +0530, Krishna Chaitanya Chundru wrote:
> On 4/16/2025 7:43 PM, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> >
> > So perhaps we should hold off with this patch.
> >
> I disagree on this, it might be causing issue with net driver, but we
> might face some other issues as explained above if we don't call
> pci_stop_root_bus().
When I wrote hold off with this patch, I meant the patch in $subject,
not your patch.
When it comes to your patch, I think that the commit log needs to explain
why it is so special.
Because AFAICT, all other PCIe controller drivers call pci_stop_root_bus()
in the .remove() callback, not in the .shutdown() callback.
Doing things differently from all other PCIe controller drivers is usually
a red flag.
Kind regards,
Niklas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists