[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250415173329.27f83c52@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 17:33:29 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Jiawen Wu <jiawenwu@...stnetic.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, andrew+netdev@...n.ch, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com, horms@...nel.org,
dlemoal@...nel.org, jdamato@...tly.com, saikrishnag@...vell.com,
vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev, przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com,
ecree.xilinx@...il.com, rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk,
mengyuanlou@...-swift.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] net: txgbe: Support to set UDP tunnel
port
On Mon, 14 Apr 2025 17:10:21 +0800 Jiawen Wu wrote:
> + udp_tunnel_nic_reset_ntf(netdev);
you issue the reset here, without clearing the ports...
> return 0;
>
> err_free_irq:
> @@ -537,6 +540,87 @@ void txgbe_do_reset(struct net_device *netdev)
> txgbe_reset(wx);
> }
>
> +static int txgbe_udp_tunnel_set(struct net_device *dev, unsigned int table,
> + unsigned int entry, struct udp_tunnel_info *ti)
> +{
> + struct wx *wx = netdev_priv(dev);
> + struct txgbe *txgbe = wx->priv;
> +
> + switch (ti->type) {
> + case UDP_TUNNEL_TYPE_VXLAN:
> + if (txgbe->vxlan_port == ti->port)
then you ignore the set if the port is already the same.
Why do you need the udp_tunnel_nic_reset_ntf() call?
Read the kdoc on that function.
It doesn't seem like your NIC loses the state.
> + break;
> +
> + if (txgbe->vxlan_port) {
> + wx_err(wx, "VXLAN port %d set, not adding port %d\n",
> + txgbe->vxlan_port, ti->port);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
Why...
> + txgbe->vxlan_port = ti->port;
> + wr32(wx, TXGBE_CFG_VXLAN, ntohs(ti->port));
> + break;
> +static const struct udp_tunnel_nic_info txgbe_udp_tunnels = {
> + .set_port = txgbe_udp_tunnel_set,
> + .unset_port = txgbe_udp_tunnel_unset,
> + .flags = UDP_TUNNEL_NIC_INFO_MAY_SLEEP,
Where do the callbacks sleep?
--
pw-bot: cr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists