[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4918f292-46b5-491f-a8da-5d42432bde56@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 15:39:13 +0200
From: Dawid Osuchowski <dawid.osuchowski@...ux.intel.com>
To: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>
Cc: intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
Aleksandr Loktionov <aleksandr.loktionov@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] net: Don't use %pK
through printk
On 2025-04-17 3:24 PM, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> acquire sleeping looks in atomic contexts.
typo? s/sleeping looks/sleeping locks/
present in patch descriptions as well
Powered by blists - more mailing lists