[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250417175318.68220-1-kuniyu@amazon.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 10:53:15 -0700
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
To: <pabeni@...hat.com>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <dsahern@...nel.org>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
<horms@...nel.org>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <kuni1840@...il.com>,
<kuniyu@...zon.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 net-next 01/14] ipv6: Validate RTA_GATEWAY of RTA_MULTIPATH in rtm_to_fib6_config().
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 10:22:33 +0200
> > +static int rtm_to_fib6_multipath_config(struct fib6_config *cfg,
> > + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> > +{
> > + struct rtnexthop *rtnh;
> > + int remaining;
> > +
> > + remaining = cfg->fc_mp_len;
> > + rtnh = (struct rtnexthop *)cfg->fc_mp;
> > +
> > + if (!rtnh_ok(rtnh, remaining)) {
> > + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Invalid nexthop configuration - no valid nexthops");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + do {
>
> I think the initial checks and the loop could be rewritten reducing the
> indentation and calling the helper only once with something alike:
>
> for (i = 0; rtnh_ok(rtnh, remaining);
> i++, rtnh = rtnh_next(rtnh, &remaining)) {
> int attrlen = rtnh_attrlen(rtnh);
> if (!attrlen)
> continue;
>
> // ...
> }
> if (i == 0) {
> NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Invalid nexthop configuration - no valid
> nexthops");
> // ..
>
> I guess it's a bit subjective, don't repost just for this.
I couldn't reduce the nest due to patch 4, so I'll keep this as is.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists