[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aACSBy5o8yCuujTz@shredder>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 08:30:47 +0300
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
pabeni@...hat.com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch, horms@...nel.org,
m.grzeschik@...gutronix.de, jv@...sburgh.net,
willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com, magnus.karlsson@...el.com,
maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com, nhorman@...driver.com,
kernelxing@...cent.com, jhs@...atatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com,
jiri@...nulli.us, gnault@...hat.com, petrm@...dia.com,
bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: add UAPI to the header guard in various
network headers
On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 01:08:40PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> fib_rule, ip6_tunnel, and a whole lot of if_* headers lack the customary
> _UAPI in the header guard. Without it YNL build can't protect from in tree
> and system headers both getting included. YNL doesn't need most of these
> but it's annoying to have to fix them one by one.
>
> Note that header installation strips this _UAPI prefix so this should
> result in no change to the end user.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists