[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABjd4YzkUYE3B7sPCm97NFcv7=nkwQTNFjSiomjCHzTFRDCLZg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 10:01:47 +0400
From: Alexey Charkov <alchark@...il.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@...nel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/13] ARM: dts: vt8500: Add VIA APC Rock/Paper board
On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 9:36 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On 16/04/2025 10:21, Alexey Charkov wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/vt8500/Makefile b/arch/arm/boot/dts/vt8500/Makefile
> > index 255f4403af91c1d6a22416ab694b8eab44bf98a2..c5a2e57d53af4babe40fe2d79b2f8d9c1ae1b8db 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/vt8500/Makefile
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/vt8500/Makefile
> > @@ -4,4 +4,5 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_VT8500) += \
> > wm8505-ref.dtb \
> > wm8650-mid.dtb \
> > wm8750-apc8750.dtb \
> > - wm8850-w70v2.dtb
> > + wm8850-w70v2.dtb \
> > + wm8950a-apc-rock.dtb
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/vt8500/wm8950-apc-rock.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/vt8500/wm8950-apc-rock.dts
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..58b3c8deb4f20ae072bf1381f1dfa5e5adeb414a
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/vt8500/wm8950-apc-rock.dts
> > @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
>
>
> Odd license, we don't do GPL v4 in the kernel. We do however dual
> license for bindings and DTS. Why choosing such license? Did you take
> the code from somewhere?
I picked the license identifier of the wm8850.dtsi include, which
defines most of the functionality for this board. No preference from
my side, and happy to use whichever license is common practice for
DTS, but I'm simply not sure how differently licensed files and
includes combine together - thus the conservative choice to stick to
what's already there. The original .dtsi was written by Tony Prisk,
not me.
Best regards,
Alexey
Powered by blists - more mailing lists