[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0c29a3f9-9e22-4e44-892d-431f06555600@suse.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 09:12:01 +0200
From: Jürgen Groß <jgross@...e.com>
To: Alexey <sdl@...ct.ru>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@...m.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
lvc-project@...uxtesting.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen-netfront: handle NULL returned by
xdp_convert_buff_to_frame()
On 17.04.25 09:00, Alexey wrote:
>
> On 17.04.2025 03:58, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> On Mon, 14 Apr 2025 18:34:01 +0000 Alexey Nepomnyashih wrote:
>>> get_page(pdata);
>> Please notice this get_page() here.
>>
>>> xdpf = xdp_convert_buff_to_frame(xdp);
>>> + if (unlikely(!xdpf)) {
>>> + trace_xdp_exception(queue->info->netdev, prog, act);
>>> + break;
>>> + }
> Do you mean that it would be better to move the get_page(pdata) call lower,
> after checking for NULL in xdpf, so that the reference count is only increased
> after a successful conversion?
I think the error handling here is generally broken (or at least very
questionable).
I suspect that in case of at least some errors the get_page() is leaking
even without this new patch.
In case I'm wrong a comment reasoning why there is no leak should be
added.
Juergen
Download attachment "OpenPGP_0xB0DE9DD628BF132F.asc" of type "application/pgp-keys" (3684 bytes)
Download attachment "OpenPGP_signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (496 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists