[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<PAXPR04MB8510715CEE1461C5CC8D8CC288BF2@PAXPR04MB8510.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2025 13:38:31 +0000
From: Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
CC: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>, Vladimir Oltean
<vladimir.oltean@....com>, Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@....com>,
"andrew+netdev@...n.ch" <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "davem@...emloft.net"
<davem@...emloft.net>, "edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>, "pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"christophe.leroy@...roup.eu" <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"imx@...ts.linux.dev" <imx@...ts.linux.dev>, "linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org"
<linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 net-next 01/14] net: enetc: add initial netc-lib driver
to support NTMP
> I see this is "Changes requested", so here are some more nitpicks from me.
>
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 05:57:39PM +0800, Wei Fang wrote:
> > Some NETC functionality is controlled using control messages sent to the
> > hardware using BD ring interface with 32B descriptor similar to transmit
> > BD ring used on ENETC. This BD ring interface is referred to as command
> > BD ring. It is used to configure functionality where the underlying
> > resources may be shared between different entities or being too large to
> > configure using direct registers. Therefore, a messaging protocol called
> > NETC Table Management Protocol (NTMP) is provided for exchanging
> > configuration and management information between the software and the
> > hardware using the command BD ring interface.
> >
> > For i.MX95, NTMP has been upgraded to version 2.0, which is incompatible
> > with LS1028A, because the message formats have been changed.
>
> Can you please add one more sentence clarifying that the LS1028A
> management protocol has been retroactively named NTMP 1.0 and its
> implementation is in enetc_cbdr.c and enetc_tsn.c? The driver, like new
> NETC documentation, refers to NTMP 2.0 as simply "NTMP".
>
Okay, but enetc_tsn.c is only existed in downstream, so it will not be
added here.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists