netdev - Re: [PATCH][next] net/mlx5: Fix spelling mistakes in mlx5_core

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d72ba588-65f6-4ef0-888d-fb7032ca6553@nvidia.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2025 22:04:22 +0300
From: Mark Bloch <mbloch@...dia.com>
To: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com>,
 Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
 Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
 "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
 <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] net/mlx5: Fix spelling mistakes in mlx5_core_dbg
 message and comments



On 18/04/2025 16:57, Colin Ian King wrote:
> There is a spelling mistake in a mlx5_core_dbg and two spelling mistakes
> in comment blocks. Fix them.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/pci_irq.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/pci_irq.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/pci_irq.c
> index 2c5f850c31f6..40024cfa3099 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/pci_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/pci_irq.c
> @@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ int mlx5_set_msix_vec_count(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev, int function_id,
>   * Free the IRQ and other resources such as rmap from the system.
>   * BUT doesn't free or remove reference from mlx5.
>   * This function is very important for the shutdown flow, where we need to
> - * cleanup system resoruces but keep mlx5 objects alive,
> + * cleanup system resources but keep mlx5 objects alive,
>   * see mlx5_irq_table_free_irqs().
>   */
>  static void mlx5_system_free_irq(struct mlx5_irq *irq)
> @@ -588,7 +588,7 @@ static void irq_pool_free(struct mlx5_irq_pool *pool)
>  	struct mlx5_irq *irq;
>  	unsigned long index;
>  
> -	/* There are cases in which we are destrying the irq_table before
> +	/* There are cases in which we are destroying the irq_table before
>  	 * freeing all the IRQs, fast teardown for example. Hence, free the irqs
>  	 * which might not have been freed.
>  	 */
> @@ -617,7 +617,7 @@ static int irq_pools_init(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev, int sf_vec, int pcif_vec,
>  	if (!mlx5_sf_max_functions(dev))
>  		return 0;
>  	if (sf_vec < MLX5_IRQ_VEC_COMP_BASE_SF) {
> -		mlx5_core_dbg(dev, "Not enught IRQs for SFs. SF may run at lower performance\n");
> +		mlx5_core_dbg(dev, "Not enough IRQs for SFs. SF may run at lower performance\n");
>  		return 0;
>  	}
>  

Acked-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@...dia.com>

Thanks