[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <360700.1745212224@famine>
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2025 22:10:24 -0700
From: Jay Vosburgh <jv@...sburgh.net>
To: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@...dia.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 net] bonding: use permanent address for MAC swapping if
device address is same
Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com> wrote:
>Hi Jay,
>
>On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 09:16:33PM -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
>> Wouldn't it be equally effective to, when the conflicting
>> interface is added, give it a random MAC to avoid the conflict? That
>> random MAC shouldn't end up as the bond's MAC, so it would exist only as
>> a placeholder of sorts.
>>
>> I'm unsure if there are many (any?) devices in common use today
>> that actually have issues with multiple ports using the same MAC, so I
>> don't think we need an overly complicated solution.
>
>I'm not familiar with infiniband devices. Can we use eth_random_addr()
>to set random addr for infiniband devices? And what about other device
>type? Just return error directly?
Infiniband devices have fixed MAC addresses that cannot be
changed. Bonding permits IB devices only in active-backup mode, and
will set fail_over_mac to active (fail_over_mac=follow is not permitted
for IB).
I don't understand your questions about other device types or
errors, could you elaborate?
-J
---
-Jay Vosburgh, jv@...sburgh.net
Powered by blists - more mailing lists