[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aAZF0JUKCF0UvfF6@mail-itl>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 15:19:12 +0200
From: Marek Marczykowski-Górecki <marmarek@...isiblethingslab.com>
To: "Lifshits, Vitaly" <vitaly.lifshits@...el.com>
Cc: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, regressions@...ts.linux.dev,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [REGRESSION] e1000e heavy packet loss on
Meteor Lake - 6.14.2
On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 03:44:02PM +0300, Lifshits, Vitaly wrote:
>
>
> On 4/16/2025 3:43 PM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 03:09:39PM +0300, Lifshits, Vitaly wrote:
> > > Can you please also share the output of ethtool -i? I would like to know the
> > > NVM version that you have on your device.
> >
> > driver: e1000e
> > version: 6.14.1+
> > firmware-version: 1.1-4
> > expansion-rom-version:
> > bus-info: 0000:00:1f.6
> > supports-statistics: yes
> > supports-test: yes
> > supports-eeprom-access: yes
> > supports-register-dump: yes
> > supports-priv-flags: yes
> >
>
> Your firmware version is not the latest, can you check with the board
> manufacturer if there is a BIOS update to your system?
I can check, but still, it's a regression in the Linux driver - old
kernel did work perfectly well on this hw. Maybe new driver tries to use
some feature that is missing (or broken) in the old firmware?
> Also, you mentioned that on another system this issue doesn't reproduce, do
> they have the same firmware version?
The other one has also 1.1-4 firmware. And I re-checked, e1000e from
6.14.2 works fine there.
--
Best Regards,
Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
Invisible Things Lab
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists