[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aAf5scux38EGRaHr@LQ3V64L9R2>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 13:18:57 -0700
From: Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
pabeni@...hat.com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch, horms@...nel.org,
donald.hunter@...il.com, sdf@...ichev.me, almasrymina@...gle.com,
dw@...idwei.uk, asml.silence@...il.com, ap420073@...il.com,
dtatulea@...dia.com, michael.chan@...adcom.com
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 14/22] eth: bnxt: always set the queue mgmt ops
On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 03:28:19PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> Core provides a centralized callback for validating per-queue settings
> but the callback is part of the queue management ops. Having the ops
> conditionally set complicates the parts of the driver which could
> otherwise lean on the core to feel it the correct settings.
feed ? ^^^^
Otherwise, I think I like Stanislav's suggestion on code
structure/flow.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists