netdev - Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] dt-bindings: wireless: bcm4329-fmac: Use wireless-controller.yaml schema

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAL_JsqKGmoiW=yDD7G4Qznsa7S2wQ7x4Mh0i4puAyFsvcnHz1A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 13:26:11 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, david@...t.cz, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, 
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, 
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Mailing List <devicetree-spec-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@...lic.gmane.org>, 
	Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>, van Spriel <arend@...adcom.com>, 
	Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@...abs.com>, 
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, 
	Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, Mailing List <devicetree-spec@...r.kernel.org>, 
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, Janne Grunau <j@...nau.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] dt-bindings: wireless: bcm4329-fmac: Use
 wireless-controller.yaml schema

On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 10:42 AM Johannes Berg
<johannes@...solutions.net> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2025-04-24 at 17:37 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks, I guess I'll hold the pull request for that. And I guess the
> > > Apple ones are on David then.
> > I think you can go ahead. I already referenced that commit from next in
> > my patches, so I hope that SHA will not change (don't rebase your tree):
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/?q=f%3Akrzysztof+%22Align+wifi+node+name+with+bindings%22
> >
>
> Hm. I thought this patchset broke it, and it is going through my tree.
> Wouldn't it be much more complex for fixes on top of it to go through
> another tree?

While it seems the reviews of the series caused more warnings for
Apple, in general, schemas creating warnings is not breaking things.
In a way, the whole point is to create warnings because if the .dts
files were perfect already we wouldn't need schemas. The main
requirement for schemas is only that they don't create warnings for
the examples. There's still too many for .dts files to worry about it
(and there's intermittent warnings from things getting merged via
different trees).

Rob