[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250424162425.1c0b46d1@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 16:24:25 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Moshe Shemesh <moshe@...dia.com>
Cc: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, "Eric
Dumazet" <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon
Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@...il.com>, Jiri
Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Andrew Lunn
<andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>, Saeed Mahameed
<saeedm@...dia.com>, "Leon Romanovsky" <leonro@...dia.com>, Mark Bloch
<mbloch@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 0/5] devlink: Add unique identifier to devlink
port function
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 16:50:37 +0300 Moshe Shemesh wrote:
> A function unique identifier (UID) is a vendor defined string of
> arbitrary length that universally identifies a function. The function
> UID can be reported by device drivers via devlink dev info command.
>
> This patch set adds UID attribute to devlink port function that reports
> the UID of the function that pertains to the devlink port. Code is also
> added to mlx5 as the first user to implement this attribute.
>
> The main purpose of adding this attribute is to allow users to
> unambiguously map between a function and the devlink port that manages
> it, which might be on another host.
>
> For example, one can retrieve the UID of a function using the "devlink
> dev info" command and then search for the same UID in the output of
> "devlink port show" command.
>
> The "devlink dev info" support for UID of a function is added by a
> separate patchset [1]. This patchset is submitted as an RFC to
> illustrate the other side of the solution.
>
> Other existing identifiers such as serial_number or board.serial_number
> are not good enough as they don't guarantee uniqueness per function. For
> example, in a multi-host NIC all PFs report the same value.
Makes sense, tho, could you please use UUID?
Let's use industry standards when possible, not "arbitrary strings".
Powered by blists - more mailing lists