[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aAuqgiSxrh24-L-D@stanley.mountain>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 18:30:10 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Cc: "zhangzekun (A)" <zhangzekun11@...wei.com>,
Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>, robh@...nel.org,
saravanak@...gle.com, justin.chen@...adcom.com,
florian.fainelli@...adcom.com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
kuba@...nel.org, kory.maincent@...tlin.com,
jacopo+renesas@...ndi.org, kieran.bingham+renesas@...asonboard.com,
maddy@...ux.ibm.com, mpe@...erman.id.au, npiggin@...il.com,
olteanv@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net, taras.chornyi@...ision.eu,
edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com, sudeep.holla@....com,
cristian.marussi@....com, arm-scmi@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
chenjun102@...wei.com, Joe Hattori <joe@...is.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] of: Add warpper function
of_find_node_by_name_balanced()
Whatever happened with this thread from Feb.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250207013117.104205-1-zhangzekun11@huawei.com/
The issue was that people weren't expecting of_find_node_by_name() to
drop the reference on the of_node. The patchset introduced a wrapper
which basically worked as expected except no liked the naming. Krzysztof
suggested that maybe the callers should be using of_get_child_by_name()
instead.
I created a Smatch warning for this and here are the four issues it
found. The line numbers are from linux-next.
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/asp2/bcmasp.c:1370 bcmasp_probe() warn: 'dev->of_node' was not incremented
drivers/net/pse-pd/tps23881.c:505 tps23881_get_of_channels() warn: 'priv->np' was not incremented
drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/core.c:301 venus_add_video_core() warn: 'dev->of_node' was not incremented
drivers/regulator/tps6594-regulator.c:618 tps6594_regulator_probe() warn: 'tps->dev->of_node' was not incremented
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists