netdev - Re: [PATCH net 2/5] dt-bindings: vertexcom-mse102x: Fix IRQ type in example

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250425173048.36dfa282@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 17:30:48 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@....net>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller"
 <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni
 <pabeni@...hat.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski
 <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/5] dt-bindings: vertexcom-mse102x: Fix IRQ type in
 example

On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 09:45:50 +0200 Stefan Wahren wrote:
> According to the MSE102x documentation the trigger type is a
> high level.
> 
> Fixes: 2717566f6661 ("dt-bindings: net: add Vertexcom MSE102x support")
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@....net>

I noticed after sending previous reply that the patchset already 
got marked as changes requested. Let me use that as an excuse to
ask to drop this patch (and resend to net-next). Happy to oblige
if DT maintainers disagree but I'm not sure we should be treating
changes to an example as a fix.