[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <33e56253-32ee-4eff-a7cd-fcf91ca4f37a@tuxon.dev>
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2025 16:43:15 +0300
From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>
To: Ryan.Wanner@...rochip.com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, robh@...nel.org,
krzk+dt@...nel.org, onor+dt@...nel.org, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com
Cc: Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] ARM: dts: microchip: sama7d65: Add MCP16502 to
sama7d65 curiosity
Hi, Ryan,
On 14.04.2025 18:38, Ryan.Wanner@...rochip.com wrote:
>>> + vldo2: LDO2 {
>>> + regulator-name = "LDO2";
>>> + regulator-min-microvolt = <1200000>;
>>> + regulator-max-microvolt = <3700000>;
>>> +
>>> + regulator-state-standby {
>>> + regulator-suspend-microvolt = <1800000>;
>> I can't find the schematics for this board. Is there a reason for keeping
>> this @1.8V in suspend?
> Sorry this was an error on my part, there is no reason to have this
> @1.8V in suspend mode.
OK, I'll drop it while applying, thank you!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists