[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250429214018.GA55582@wp.pl>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 23:40:18 +0200
From: Stanislaw Gruszka <stf_xl@...pl>
To: Fedor Pchelkin <pchelkin@...ras.ru>
Cc: Alexei Safin <a.safin@...a.ru>, lvc-project@...uxtesting.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iwlegacy: 4965: fix possible out-of-bounds access in
il4965_tx_cmd_build_rate()
Hi
On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 08:15:59PM +0300, Fedor Pchelkin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sun, 27. Apr 08:39, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/4965-mac.c b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/4965-mac.c
> > > index 78dee8ccfebf..f60d9b9798c1 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/4965-mac.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/4965-mac.c
> > > @@ -1572,7 +1572,7 @@ il4965_tx_cmd_build_rate(struct il_priv *il,
> > > */
> > > rate_idx = info->control.rates[0].idx;
> > > if ((info->control.rates[0].flags & IEEE80211_TX_RC_MCS) || rate_idx < 0
> > > - || rate_idx > RATE_COUNT_LEGACY)
> > > + || rate_idx >= RATE_COUNT_LEGACY)
> > > rate_idx = rate_lowest_index(&il->bands[info->band], sta);
> >
> > .. so looks the check is fine already and changing it will induce a bug
> > for RATE_54M_INDEX.
> >
> > Regards
> > Stanislaw
> >
> > > /* For 5 GHZ band, remap mac80211 rate indices into driver indices */
> > > if (info->band == NL80211_BAND_5GHZ)
>
> Here goes the fragment:
>
> rate_idx += IL_FIRST_OFDM_RATE;
> /* Get PLCP rate for tx_cmd->rate_n_flags */
> rate_plcp = il_rates[rate_idx].plcp;
>
> > > --
> > > 2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)
> > >
>
> Looks like the proper checks should be added to address the 5GHZ case and
> validate that the index won't exceed the array boundaries after being shifted
> by IL_FIRST_OFDM_RATE.
Good point. It make sense to move rate_idx range check after possible
IL_FIRST_OFDM_RATE addition for 5GHz.
Regards
Stanislaw
Powered by blists - more mailing lists