[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aBSHyo-pu7K_CfpI@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 May 2025 10:52:26 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: "Xin Li (Intel)" <xin@...or.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
acme@...nel.org, jgross@...e.com, andrew.cooper3@...rix.com,
peterz@...radead.org, namhyung@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
irogers@...gle.com, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
kan.liang@...ux.intel.com, wei.liu@...nel.org,
ajay.kaher@...adcom.com, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
tony.luck@...el.com, pbonzini@...hat.com, vkuznets@...hat.com,
seanjc@...gle.com, luto@...nel.org, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com,
kys@...rosoft.com, haiyangz@...rosoft.com, decui@...rosoft.com,
dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com, ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/15] x86/msr: Move rdtsc{,_ordered}() to <asm/tsc.h>
* Xin Li (Intel) <xin@...or.com> wrote:
> For some reason, there are some TSC-related functions in the MSR
> header even though there is a tsc.h header.
>
> Relocate rdtsc{,_ordered}() from <asm/msr.h> to <asm/tsc.h>, and
> subsequently remove the inclusion of <asm/msr.h> in <asm/tsc.h>.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xin Li (Intel) <xin@...or.com>
> Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/tsc.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/tsc.h
> @@ -7,7 +7,81 @@
>
> #include <asm/cpufeature.h>
> #include <asm/processor.h>
> -#include <asm/msr.h>
Note that in the tip:x86/msr commit I've applied today I've
intentionally delayed the removal of this header dependency, to reduce
the probability of breaking -next today or in the near future.
We can remove that now superfluous header dependency in a future patch.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists