[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a9633874-a41c-4f62-9b80-33785c0eec10@lunn.ch>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2025 14:24:03 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@....net>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/5] net: vertexcom: mse102x: Add warning about
IRQ trigger type
On Tue, May 06, 2025 at 10:38:53AM +0200, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Am 05.05.25 um 18:32 schrieb Andrew Lunn:
> > > + if (!irq_data) {
> > > + netdev_err(ndev, "Invalid IRQ: %d\n", ndev->irq);
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + switch (irqd_get_trigger_type(irq_data)) {
> > > + case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH:
> > > + case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW:
> > > + break;
> > > + default:
> > > + netdev_warn_once(ndev, "Only IRQ type level recommended, please update your firmware.\n");
> > I would probably put DT in there somewhere. firmware is rather
> > generic.
> I'm fine with changing it to DT. I slightly remember of a patch for a
> BCM2835 driver, which also had a warning to update the DT and a reviewer
> requested it to change it to firmware. I don't remember the reason behind
> it, maybe it's the fact that not all user know what a DT / devicetree is. A
> quick grep shows both variants (DT vs firmware).
The line gets long, but "Only IRQ type level recommended, please
update your device tree firmware.\n" is good for me.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists