netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf v2 2/2] bpf: Clarify handling of mark and tstamp by redirect

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <bbe5b4db-0c32-4695-9f2b-ebc042c040cd@linux.dev>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2025 12:19:41 -0700
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>
To: Paul Chaignon <paul.chaignon@...il.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
 Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
 bpf@...r.kernel.org, Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf v2 2/2] bpf: Clarify handling of mark and tstamp by
 redirect_peer

On 5/5/25 12:58 PM, Paul Chaignon wrote:
> When switching network namespaces with the bpf_redirect_peer helper, the
> skb->mark and skb->tstamp fields are not zeroed out like they can be on
> a typical netns switch. This patch clarifies that in the helper
> description.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul Chaignon <paul.chaignon@...il.com>

Jakub, could you help to land them to the net tree? Thanks.

Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...nel.org>