[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250507154205.00003839@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2025 15:42:05 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
To: <alejandro.lucero-palau@....com>
CC: <linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<dan.j.williams@...el.com>, <edward.cree@....com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
<dave.jiang@...el.com>, Alejandro Lucero <alucerop@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 02/22] sfc: add cxl support
On Thu, 17 Apr 2025 22:29:05 +0100
<alejandro.lucero-palau@....com> wrote:
> From: Alejandro Lucero <alucerop@....com>
>
> Add CXL initialization based on new CXL API for accel drivers and make
> it dependent on kernel CXL configuration.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alejandro Lucero <alucerop@....com>
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Much as everyone should trust my reviews...
Needs some tags from sfc folk.
Who else needs to tag if the plan is to route this through the CXL tree?
Or are we looking at an infrastructure series through cxl.git
driver next cycle, or immutable branch with infrastructure
going through appropriate net tree and cxl?
Jonathan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists