netdev - Re: [RFC 19/19] mm, netmem: remove the page pool members in struct page

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAC_iWj+vweve6V33cqHGZ6tSehs85vXd7VKAGNiEjLoK2pc+PQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 May 2025 10:26:00 +0300
From: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>
To: Byungchul Park <byungchul@...com>
Cc: willy@...radead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-mm@...ck.org, kernel_team@...ynix.com, kuba@...nel.org, 
	almasrymina@...gle.com, harry.yoo@...cle.com, hawk@...nel.org, 
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, 
	davem@...emloft.net, john.fastabend@...il.com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch, 
	edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com, vishal.moola@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 19/19] mm, netmem: remove the page pool members in struct page

Hi Byungchul

On Fri, 9 May 2025 at 14:51, Byungchul Park <byungchul@...com> wrote:
>
> Now that all the users of the page pool members in struct page have been
> gone, the members can be removed from struct page.  However, the space
> in struct page needs to be kept using a place holder with the same size,
> until struct netmem_desc has its own instance, not overlayed onto struct
> page, to avoid conficting with other members within struct page.
>

FWIW similar mirroring was intially proposed [0] a few years ago

> Remove the page pool members in struct page and replace with a place
> holder.  The place holder should be removed once struct netmem_desc has
> its own instance.

instance? To make sure I understand this, the netmem_descs are
expected to be allocated in the future right?

[...]

> -
>  static inline struct net_iov_area *net_iov_owner(const struct netmem_desc *niov)
>  {
>         return niov->owner;
> diff --git a/include/net/netmem_type.h b/include/net/netmem_type.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..6a3ac8e908515
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/net/netmem_type.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> + *
> + *     Author: Byungchul Park <max.byungchul.park@...il.com>

Shouldn't Minas authorship be preserved here?

> + */
> +
> +#ifndef _NET_NETMEM_TYPE_H
> +#define _NET_NETMEM_TYPE_H
> +
> +#include <linux/stddef.h>
> +
> +struct netmem_desc {
> +       unsigned long __unused_padding;
> +       struct_group_tagged(__netmem_desc, actual_data,
> +               unsigned long pp_magic;
> +               struct page_pool *pp;
> +               struct net_iov_area *owner;
> +               unsigned long dma_addr;
> +               atomic_long_t pp_ref_count;
> +       );
> +};
> +
> +#endif /* _NET_NETMEM_TYPE_H */
> --
> 2.17.1
>

[0] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/1549550196-25581-1-git-send-email-ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org/
Thanks
/Ilias