[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <d6b58684b7e5bfb628f7313e6893d0097904e1d1.1746940107.git.lukas@wunner.de>
Date: Sun, 11 May 2025 07:12:00 +0200
From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@...il.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net] tools: ynl-gen: Allow multi-attr without
nested-attributes again
Since commit ce6cb8113c84 ("tools: ynl-gen: individually free previous
values on double set"), specifying the "multi-attr" property raises an
error unless the "nested-attributes" property is specified as well:
File "tools/net/ynl/./pyynl/ynl_gen_c.py", line 1147, in _load_nested_sets
child = self.pure_nested_structs.get(nested)
^^^^^^
UnboundLocalError: cannot access local variable 'nested' where it is not associated with a value
This appears to be a bug since there are existing specs which omit
"nested-attributes" on "multi-attr" attributes. Also, according to
Documentation/userspace-api/netlink/specs.rst, multi-attr "is the
recommended way of implementing arrays (no extra nesting)", suggesting
that nesting should even be avoided in favor of multi-attr.
Fix the indentation of the if-block introduced by the commit to avoid
the error.
Fixes: ce6cb8113c84 ("tools: ynl-gen: individually free previous values on double set")
Signed-off-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
---
tools/net/ynl/pyynl/ynl_gen_c.py | 7 +++----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/net/ynl/pyynl/ynl_gen_c.py b/tools/net/ynl/pyynl/ynl_gen_c.py
index 30c0a34..a7f08ed 100755
--- a/tools/net/ynl/pyynl/ynl_gen_c.py
+++ b/tools/net/ynl/pyynl/ynl_gen_c.py
@@ -1143,10 +1143,9 @@ class Family(SpecFamily):
self.pure_nested_structs[nested].request = True
if attr in rs_members['reply']:
self.pure_nested_structs[nested].reply = True
-
- if spec.is_multi_val():
- child = self.pure_nested_structs.get(nested)
- child.in_multi_val = True
+ if spec.is_multi_val():
+ child = self.pure_nested_structs.get(nested)
+ child.in_multi_val = True
self._sort_pure_types()
--
2.47.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists