[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aCCi4JcJtzh1bfP-@effaecf3b85e>
Date: Sun, 11 May 2025 13:15:12 +0000
From: Subbaraya Sundeep <sbhatta@...vell.com>
To: <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
<kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>, <horms@...nel.org>,
<gakula@...vell.com>, <hkelam@...vell.com>, <sgoutham@...vell.com>,
<lcherian@...vell.com>, <bbhushan2@...vell.com>, <jerinj@...vell.com>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [net PATCH 0/2] octeontx2-pf: Do not detect MACSEC block based
on silicon
Hi,
Please igonre this series. Wrong prefix in subject. Will correct and
send v2.
Thanks,
Sundeep
On 2025-05-11 at 04:40:01, Subbaraya Sundeep (sbhatta@...vell.com) wrote:
> Out of various silicon variants of CN10K series some have hardware
> MACSEC block for offloading MACSEC operations and some do not.
> AF driver already has the information of whether MACSEC is present
> or not on running silicon. Hence fetch that information from
> AF via mailbox message.
>
> Subbaraya Sundeep (2):
> octeontx2-af: Add MACSEC capability flag
> octeontx2-pf: macsec: Get MACSEC capability flag from AF
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/mbox.h | 2 ++
> drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu.c | 3 ++
> .../ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_common.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> .../ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_common.h | 4 +--
> .../net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_pf.c | 2 ++
> 5 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.7.4
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists