[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250512165749.375bcbbd@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 16:57:49 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman
<horms@...nel.org>, Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
Jason Xing <kernelxing@...cent.com>, Richard Cochran
<richardcochran@...il.com>, Thomas Petazzoni
<thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Maxime Chevallier
<maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>, "Russell King (Oracle)"
<linux@...linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: Add support for providing the PTP
hardware source in tsinfo
On Mon, 12 May 2025 10:19:42 +0200 Kory Maincent wrote:
> > - name: ts-hwtstamp-source
> > - enum-name: hwtstamp-source
> > - header: linux/ethtool.h
> > + name: hwtstamp-source
> > + name-prefix: hwtstamp-source-
> > type: enum
> > - name-prefix: hwtstamp-source
>
> Should we keep the enum-name property as is is already use, or do you prefer to
> rename all its use to ethtool-hwtstamp-source?
Looks like we already have a number of such cases - attribute name
and enum name are the same. I'd keep them the same, I don't think
there's much room for confusion either in C or Python.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists