[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250513132542.GA3339421@horms.kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 14:25:42 +0100
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Subbaraya Sundeep <sbhatta@...vell.com>
Cc: andrew+netdev@...n.ch, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, gakula@...vell.com,
hkelam@...vell.com, sgoutham@...vell.com, lcherian@...vell.com,
bbhushan2@...vell.com, jerinj@...vell.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net v2] octeontx2-pf: Do not reallocate all ntuple filters
On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 06:22:37PM +0530, Subbaraya Sundeep wrote:
> If ntuple filters count is modified followed by
> unicast filters count using devlink then the ntuple count
> set by user is ignored and all the ntuple filters are
> being reallocated. Fix this by storing the ntuple count
> set by user. Without this patch, say if user tries
> to modify ntuple count as 8 followed by ucast filter count as 4
> using devlink commands then ntuple count is being reverted to
> default value 16 i.e, not retaining user set value 8.
>
> Fixes: 39c469188b6d ("octeontx2-pf: Add ucast filter count configurability via devlink.")
> Signed-off-by: Subbaraya Sundeep <sbhatta@...vell.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
I don't think there is any need to repost because of this, but for future
reference it is normal to include the PATCH keyword along with the net
keyword in the Subject.
e.g. Subject: [PATCH net v2] ...
Likewise for net-next.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists