netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v6 04/14] net: phy: dp83822: Add support for phy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250513155957.700c1a05@kmaincent-XPS-13-7390>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 16:00:15 +0200
From: Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>
To: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
 thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Jakub Kicinski
 <kuba@...nel.org>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni
 <pabeni@...hat.com>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Christophe Leroy
 <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>, Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>,
 Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, Heiner Kallweit
 <hkallweit1@...il.com>, Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>, Marek
 Behún <kabel@...nel.org>, Oleksij Rempel
 <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>, Nicolò Veronese
 <nicveronese@...il.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
 mwojtas@...omium.org, Antoine Tenart <atenart@...nel.org>,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Krzysztof
 Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Romain
 Gantois <romain.gantois@...tlin.com>, Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>,
 Dimitri Fedrau <dimitri.fedrau@...bherr.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 04/14] net: phy: dp83822: Add support for
 phy_port representation

On Wed,  7 May 2025 15:53:20 +0200
Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com> wrote:

> With the phy_port representation intrduced, we can use .attach_port to
> populate the port information based on either the straps or the
> ti,fiber-mode property. This allows simplifying the probe function and
> allow users to override the strapping configuration.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
> ---

...
  
> +static int dp83822_attach_port(struct phy_device *phydev, struct phy_port
> *port) +{
> +	struct dp83822_private *dp83822 = phydev->priv;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (port->mediums) {
> +		if (phy_port_is_fiber(port))
> +			dp83822->fx_enabled = true;
> +	} else {
> +		ret = dp83822_read_straps(phydev);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF_MDIO

if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF_MDIO) seems to be more used than ifdef

Regards,
-- 
Köry Maincent, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com