[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7a951b14-c1df-488e-b63b-cdcb4a854b5c@amd.com>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 13:27:59 -0500
From: "Cheatham, Benjamin" <bcheatha@....com>
To: alejandro.lucero-palau@....com
Cc: Martin Habets <habetsm.xilinx@...il.com>, Zhi Wang <zhi@...dia.com>,
Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>, linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, dan.j.williams@...el.com, edward.cree@....com,
davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
edumazet@...gle.com, dave.jiang@...el.com,
Ben Cheatham <Benjamin.Cheatham@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 06/22] sfc: make regs setup with checking and set
media ready
On 5/12/2025 11:10 AM, alejandro.lucero-palau@....com wrote:
> From: Alejandro Lucero <alucerop@....com>
>
> Use cxl code for registers discovery and mapping.
>
> Validate capabilities found based on those registers against expected
> capabilities.
>
> Set media ready explicitly as there is no means for doing so without
> a mailbox and without the related cxl register, not mandatory for type2.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alejandro Lucero <alucerop@....com>
> Reviewed-by: Martin Habets <habetsm.xilinx@...il.com>
> Reviewed-by: Zhi Wang <zhi@...dia.com>
> Acked-by: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_cxl.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_cxl.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_cxl.c
> index 753d5b7d49b6..79427a85a1b7 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_cxl.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_cxl.c
> @@ -19,10 +19,13 @@
>
> int efx_cxl_init(struct efx_probe_data *probe_data)
> {
> + DECLARE_BITMAP(expected, CXL_MAX_CAPS) = {};
> + DECLARE_BITMAP(found, CXL_MAX_CAPS) = {};
> struct efx_nic *efx = &probe_data->efx;
> struct pci_dev *pci_dev = efx->pci_dev;
> struct efx_cxl *cxl;
> u16 dvsec;
> + int rc;
>
> probe_data->cxl_pio_initialised = false;
>
> @@ -43,6 +46,30 @@ int efx_cxl_init(struct efx_probe_data *probe_data)
> if (!cxl)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> + set_bit(CXL_DEV_CAP_HDM, expected);
> + set_bit(CXL_DEV_CAP_HDM, expected);
You have duplicate lines here. I think I pointed this out a couple of
revisions ago, but it probably got missed.
Thanks,
Ben
> + set_bit(CXL_DEV_CAP_RAS, expected);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists