netdev - Re: [PATCH iwl-net v2] ice: add a separate Rx handler for flow director commands

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c8daed51-5935-4070-8d8b-8994d348f746@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 13:50:22 -0700
From: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
To: Michal Kubiak <michal.kubiak@...el.com>,
	<intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>
CC: <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>, <horms@...nel.org>,
	<anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>, Michal Swiatkowski
	<michal.swiatkowski@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-net v2] ice: add a separate Rx handler for flow
 director commands



On 5/14/2025 5:37 AM, Michal Kubiak wrote:
> The "ice" driver implementation uses the control VSI to handle
> the flow director configuration for PFs and VFs.
> 
> Unfortunately, although a separate VSI type was created to handle flow
> director queues, the Rx queue handler was shared between the flow
> director and a standard NAPI Rx handler.
> 
> Such a design approach was not very flexible. First, it mixed hotpath
> and slowpath code, blocking their further optimization. It also created
> a huge overkill for the flow director command processing, which is
> descriptor-based only, so there is no need to allocate Rx data buffers.
> 
> For the above reasons, implement a separate Rx handler for the control
> VSI. Also, remove from the NAPI handler the code dedicated to
> configuring the flow director rules on VFs.
> Do not allocate Rx data buffers to the flow director queues because
> their processing is descriptor-based only.
> Finally, allow Rx data queues to be allocated only for VSIs that have
> netdev assigned to them.
> 
> This handler splitting approach is the first step in converting the
> driver to use the Page Pool (which can only be used for data queues).
> 
> Test hints:
>   1. Create a VF for any PF managed by the ice driver.
>   2. In a loop, add and delete flow director rules for the VF, e.g.:
> 
>        for i in {1..128}; do
>            q=$(( i % 16 ))
>            ethtool -N ens802f0v0 flow-type tcp4 dst-port "$i" action "$q"
>        done
> 
>        for i in {0..127}; do
>            ethtool -N ens802f0v0 delete "$i"
>        done
> 
> Suggested-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>
> Suggested-by: Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@...el.com>
> Acked-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
> Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>
> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Kubiak <michal.kubiak@...el.com>
> ---

I assume you meant for this to be still targeted at iwl-next and the
iwl-net was a typo?

I'll queue on the next dev-queue.

Thanks,
Jake