[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20d1d07b-a656-48ab-9e0e-7ba04214aa3f@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 10:44:41 -0400
From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Steve Sears <sjs@...merspace.com>,
Thomas Haynes <loghyr@...merspace.com>,
Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-tls-handshake <kernel-tls-handshake@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: RPC-with-TLS client does not receive traffic
Resending with linux-nfs and kernel-tls-handshake on Cc
On 5/15/25 10:35 AM, Chuck Lever wrote:
> Hi -
>
> I'm troubleshooting an issue where, after a successful handshake, the
> kernel TLS socket's data_ready callback is never invoked. I'm able to
> reproduce this 100% on an Atom-based system with a Realtek Ethernet
> device. But on many other systems, the problem is intermittent or not
> reproducible.
>
> The problem seems to be that strp->msg_ready is already set when
> tls_data_ready is called, and that prevents any further processing. I
> see that msg_ready is set when the handshake daemon sets the ktls
> security parameters, and is then never cleared.
>
> function: tls_setsockopt
> function: do_tls_setsockopt_conf
> function: tls_set_device_offload_rx
> function: tls_set_sw_offload
> function: init_prot_info
> function: tls_strp_init
> function: tls_sw_strparser_arm
> function: tls_strp_check_rcv
> function: tls_strp_read_sock
> function: tls_strp_load_anchor_with_queue
> function: tls_rx_msg_size
> function: tls_device_rx_resync_new_rec
> function: tls_rx_msg_ready
>
> For a working system (a VMware guest using a VMXNet device), setsockopt
> leaves msg_ready set to zero:
>
> function: tls_setsockopt
> function: do_tls_setsockopt_conf
> function: tls_set_device_offload_rx
> function: tls_set_sw_offload
> function: init_prot_info
> function: tls_strp_init
> function: tls_sw_strparser_arm
> function: tls_strp_check_rcv
>
> The first tls_data_ready call then handles the waiting ingress data as
> expected.
>
> Any advice is appreciated.
>
--
Chuck Lever
Powered by blists - more mailing lists