netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net/mlx5: Use to_delayed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e2c6c100-c1bb-45f1-a171-2effdd69e409@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 09:23:01 +0300
From: Tariq Toukan <ttoukan.linux@...il.com>
To: Chen Ni <nichen@...as.ac.cn>, saeedm@...dia.com, leon@...nel.org,
 tariqt@...dia.com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch, davem@...emloft.net,
 edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net/mlx5: Use to_delayed_work()



On 14/05/2025 10:24, Chen Ni wrote:
> Use to_delayed_work() instead of open-coding it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chen Ni <nichen@...as.ac.cn>
> ---
> Changelog:
> 
> v1 -> v2:
> 
> 1. Specify the target tree.
> ---
>   drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/cmd.c | 3 +--
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/cmd.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/cmd.c
> index e53dbdc0a7a1..b1aeea7c4a91 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/cmd.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/cmd.c
> @@ -927,8 +927,7 @@ static void mlx5_cmd_comp_handler(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev, u64 vec, bool force
>   
>   static void cb_timeout_handler(struct work_struct *work)
>   {
> -	struct delayed_work *dwork = container_of(work, struct delayed_work,
> -						  work);
> +	struct delayed_work *dwork = to_delayed_work(work);
>   	struct mlx5_cmd_work_ent *ent = container_of(dwork,
>   						     struct mlx5_cmd_work_ent,
>   						     cb_timeout_work);

Reviewed-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>

Thanks for your patch.