netdev - Re: [PATCH v15 net-next 0/5] DUALPI2 patch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <936046df-5ed9-49e5-906f-dec64a63f531@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 10:04:28 +0200
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: chia-yu.chang@...ia-bell-labs.com, horms@...nel.org,
 donald.hunter@...il.com, xandfury@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 dave.taht@...il.com, jhs@...atatu.com, kuba@...nel.org,
 stephen@...workplumber.org, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, jiri@...nulli.us,
 davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
 ast@...erby.net, liuhangbin@...il.com, shuah@...nel.org,
 linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, ij@...nel.org, ncardwell@...gle.com,
 koen.de_schepper@...ia-bell-labs.com, g.white@...lelabs.com,
 ingemar.s.johansson@...csson.com, mirja.kuehlewind@...csson.com,
 cheshire@...le.com, rs.ietf@....at, Jason_Livingood@...cast.com,
 vidhi_goel@...le.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 net-next 0/5] DUALPI2 patch

Hi,

On 5/9/25 11:47 PM, chia-yu.chang@...ia-bell-labs.com wrote:
> From: Chia-Yu Chang <chia-yu.chang@...ia-bell-labs.com>
> 
> Hello,
> 
>   Please find the DualPI2 patch v14.
[...]
> 
> For more details of DualPI2, please refer IETF RFC9332 (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9332).

A couple of process notes I should have mentioned earlier. The cover
letter should be more descriptive WRT the actual series contents and
goal, beyond the changelog itself.

Each patch should contain individual changelog, to help the reviewers.
At this point you don't need to add individual changelog for past
revisions, but for any eventual later one.

Not worth to repost just for the above, but if a new revision will be
needed, please take care.

/P