[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <D9XO2721HEQI.3BGSHJXCHPTL@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2025 16:48:53 +0200
From: "Benno Lossin" <lossin@...nel.org>
To: "FUJITA Tomonori" <fujita.tomonori@...il.com>, <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
Cc: <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
<kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>, <robh@...nel.org>,
<krzk+dt@...nel.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>, <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
<linux@...linux.org.uk>, <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>, <kabel@...nel.org>,
<andrei.botila@....nxp.com>, <tmgross@...ch.edu>, <ojeda@...nel.org>,
<alex.gaynor@...il.com>, <boqun.feng@...il.com>, <gary@...yguo.net>,
<bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, <benno.lossin@...ton.me>,
<a.hindborg@...nel.org>, <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, <dakr@...nel.org>,
<sd@...asysnail.net>, <michael@...sekall.de>, <daniel@...rotopia.org>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v10 7/7] rust: net::phy sync with
match_phy_device C changes
On Fri May 16, 2025 at 2:30 PM CEST, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> On Thu, 15 May 2025 13:27:12 +0200
> Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com> wrote:
>> @@ -574,6 +577,23 @@ pub const fn create_phy_driver<T: Driver>() -> DriverVTable {
>> /// This trait is used to create a [`DriverVTable`].
>> #[vtable]
>> pub trait Driver {
>> + /// # Safety
>> + ///
>> + /// For the duration of `'a`,
>> + /// - the pointer must point at a valid `phy_driver`, and the caller
>> + /// must be in a context where all methods defined on this struct
>> + /// are safe to call.
>> + unsafe fn from_raw<'a>(ptr: *const bindings::phy_driver) -> &'a Self
>> + where
>> + Self: Sized,
>> + {
>> + // CAST: `Self` is a `repr(transparent)` wrapper around `bindings::phy_driver`.
>> + let ptr = ptr.cast::<Self>();
>> + // SAFETY: by the function requirements the pointer is valid and we have unique access for
>> + // the duration of `'a`.
>> + unsafe { &*ptr }
>> + }
>
> We might need to update the comment. phy_driver is const so I think
> that we can access to it any time.
Why is any type implementing `Driver` a transparent wrapper around
`bindings::phy_driver`?
>> /// Defines certain other features this PHY supports.
>> /// It is a combination of the flags in the [`flags`] module.
>> const FLAGS: u32 = 0;
>> @@ -602,7 +622,7 @@ fn get_features(_dev: &mut Device) -> Result {
>>
>> /// Returns true if this is a suitable driver for the given phydev.
>> /// If not implemented, matching is based on [`Driver::PHY_DEVICE_ID`].
>> - fn match_phy_device(_dev: &Device) -> bool {
>> + fn match_phy_device<T: Driver>(_dev: &mut Device, _drv: &T) -> bool {
>> false
>> }
>
> I think that it could be a bit simpler:
>
> fn match_phy_device(_dev: &mut Device, _drv: &Self) -> bool
>
> Or making it a trait method might be more idiomatic?
>
> fn match_phy_device(&self, _dev: &mut Device) -> bool
Yeah that would make most sense.
---
Cheers,
Benno
Powered by blists - more mailing lists