lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250516202149.GL3339421@horms.kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2025 21:21:49 +0100
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Cc: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] net: airoha: Fix an error handling path in
 airoha_alloc_gdm_port()

On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 09:16:13PM +0100, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 09:59:35PM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> > If register_netdev() fails, the error handling path of the probe will not
> > free the memory allocated by the previous airoha_metadata_dst_alloc() call
> > because port->dev->reg_state will not be NETREG_REGISTERED.
> > 
> > So, an explicit airoha_metadata_dst_free() call is needed in this case to
> > avoid a memory leak.
> > 
> > Fixes: af3cf757d5c9 ("net: airoha: Move DSA tag in DMA descriptor")
> > Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
> > ---
> > Changes in v3:
> >   - None
> > 
> > Changes in v2:
> >   - New patch
> > v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/5c94b9b3850f7f29ed653e2205325620df28c3ff.1746715755.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr/
> > 
> > Compile tested only.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>

Sorry, I was a little too hasty.

This patch looks good to me, but as this is a fix for change
present in net it should be targeted at net.

  Subject: [PATCH v4 net] ...

And it should be split out from the patchset comprising the remaining
patches in this series, which appear to be clean-ups (or at least not
but fixes). This rump patch-set should be targeted at net-next.
And ideally, IMHO, have a cover letter.

  Subject: [PATCH v4 net-next 0/3] ...

Thanks!

-- 
pw-bot: changes-requested

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ