[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<DS0PR18MB528549682B139522F013838FB79CA@DS0PR18MB5285.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 11:07:44 +0000
From: Igor Russkikh <irusskikh@...vell.com>
To: Wentao Liang <vulab@...as.ac.cn>,
"andrew+netdev@...n.ch"
<andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"kuba@...nel.org"
<kuba@...nel.org>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Jackson Pooyappadam
<jpooyappadam@...vell.com>
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH] net: atlantic: Add error handling in
set_raw_ingress_record()
> The set_raw_ingress_record() calls aq_mss_mdio_write() but does not check the return value. A proper implementation can be found in get_raw_ingress_record(). Add error handling for aq_mss_mdio_write(). If the write fails, return immediately.
>
> The set_raw_ingress_record() calls aq_mss_mdio_write() but does not
> check the return value. A proper implementation can be found in
> get_raw_ingress_record().
>
> Add error handling for aq_mss_mdio_write(). If the write fails,
> return immediately.
Hi Wentao,
aq_mss_mdio_write is practically always returns success as of today.
So introducing your change without actually making aq_mss_mdio_write and aq_mdio_write_word returning error code is useless IMHO.
> + ret = aq_mss_mdio_write(hw, MDIO_MMD_VEND1,
> + MSS_INGRESS_LUT_ADDR_CTL_REGISTER_ADDR,
> + lut_sel_reg.word_0);
> + if (unlikely(ret))
> + return ret;
> + ret = aq_mss_mdio_write(hw, MDIO_MMD_VEND1, MSS_INGRESS_LUT_CTL_REGISTER_ADDR,
> + lut_op_reg.word_0);
> + if (unlikely(ret))
> + return ret;
You introduce checks only for the two last operations, but not for many others above them. Any reason to do so?
Overall, I think if you want to improve in this direction:
1) we should propagate error conditions from aq_mdio_write_word
2) all instances of aq_mss_mdio_write should have checks for err condition
3) this is not actually a bug, but improvement - therefore make sense to post this into net-next.
Regards,
Igor
Powered by blists - more mailing lists