[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aCtQOek-wLqSh38g@mini-arch>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 08:37:29 -0700
From: Stanislav Fomichev <stfomichev@...il.com>
To: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>,
Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
sdf@...ichev.me, ap420073@...il.com, praan@...gle.com,
shivajikant@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 8/9] net: devmem: ksft: upgrade rx test to
send 1K data
On 05/19, Mina Almasry wrote:
> The current test just sends "hello\nworld" and verifies that is the
> string received on the RX side. That is fine, but improve the test a bit
> by sending 1K data. The test should be improved further to send more
> data, but for now this should be a welcome improvement.
>
> The test will send a repeating pattern of 0x01, 0x02, ... 0x06. The
> ncdevmem `-v 7` flag will verify this pattern. ncdevmem will provide
> useful debugging info when the test fails, such as the frags received
> and verified fine, and which frag exactly failed, what was the expected
> byte pattern, and what is the actual byte pattern received. All this
> debug information will be useful when the test fails.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists