[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6ec93824-1db7-4839-a0ba-845f4e30d883@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 09:32:57 +0200
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Ronak Doshi <ronak.doshi@...adcom.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Guolin Yang <guolin.yang@...adcom.com>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>, Andrew Lunn
<andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] vmxnet3: correctly report gso type for UDP tunnels
On 5/16/25 1:38 AM, Ronak Doshi wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 2:25 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> Not sure if the stack itself cares, but drivers look at those
>> fields for TSO. I see a call to skb_inner_transport_offset()
>> in vmxnet3_parse_hdr(). One thing to try would be to configure
>> the machine for forwarding so that the packet comes via LRO
>> and leaves via TSO.
>
> I see. Yes, drivers do check for it. Sure, let me update the patch to not set
> encapsulation.
AFAICS, not setting skb->encapsulation, but still building a GSO packet
would still break the s/w segmentation in the scenario described by my
previous email.
/P
Powered by blists - more mailing lists