[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aCyAcbNqKRlPnadx@hoboy.vegasvil.org>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 06:15:29 -0700
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: Jeongjun Park <aha310510@...il.com>
Cc: andrew+netdev@...n.ch, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, yangbo.lu@....com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ptp: remove ptp->n_vclocks check logic in
ptp_vclock_in_use()
On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 12:37:35AM +0900, Jeongjun Park wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/ptp/ptp_clock.c b/drivers/ptp/ptp_clock.c
> index 35a5994bf64f..0ae9f074fc52 100644
> --- a/drivers/ptp/ptp_clock.c
> +++ b/drivers/ptp/ptp_clock.c
> @@ -412,9 +412,8 @@ static int unregister_vclock(struct device *dev, void *data)
>
> int ptp_clock_unregister(struct ptp_clock *ptp)
> {
> - if (ptp_vclock_in_use(ptp)) {
> + if (ptp_vclock_in_use(ptp))
> device_for_each_child(&ptp->dev, NULL, unregister_vclock);
> - }
>
> ptp->defunct = 1;
> wake_up_interruptible(&ptp->tsev_wq);
This hunk is not related to the subject of the patch. Please remove it.
Thanks,
Richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists