lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250519200710.714715d3@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 20:07:10 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@...il.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
 pabeni@...hat.com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch, horms@...nel.org,
 jacob.e.keller@...el.com, sdf@...ichev.me, jstancek@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 08/11] tools: ynl-gen: support weird
 sub-message formats

On Mon, 19 May 2025 10:25:37 +0100 Donald Hunter wrote:
> > @@ -2234,8 +2260,9 @@ _C_KW = {
> >  
> >          ri.cw.block_start(line=f'{kw} (!strcmp(sel, "{name}"))')
> >          get_lines, init_lines, _ = arg._attr_get(ri, var)
> > -        for line in init_lines:
> > -            ri.cw.p(line)
> > +        if init_lines:
> > +            for line in init_lines:  
> 
> I have a tiny preference for this construction, to eliminate the if
> statement. WDYT?
> 
>            for line in init_lines or []:

Sure thing, the if was annoying me, too

Will post v2 tomorrow morning, thanks for the reviews!

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ