[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250520072133.GO365796@horms.kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 08:21:33 +0100
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Cc: Greg Ungerer <gerg@...ux-m68k.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>,
Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
Doug Berger <opendmb@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
Thangaraj Samynathan <Thangaraj.S@...rochip.com>,
Rengarajan Sundararajan <Rengarajan.S@...rochip.com>,
Microchip Linux Driver Support <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
Linux USB Mailing List <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] net: phy: fixed_phy: remove irq argument
from fixed_phy_register
On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 10:35:56PM +0200, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> All callers pass PHY_POLL, therefore remove irq argument from
> fixed_phy_register().
>
> Note: I keep the irq argument in fixed_phy_add_gpiod() for now,
> for the case that somebody may want to use a GPIO interrupt in
> the future, by e.g. adding a call to fwnode_irq_get() to
> fixed_phy_get_gpiod().
>
> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists