[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEA6p_BxSA16cMXr5NaJCLZ+KWD2YVVwEdvVX_QG=_gyvNCP=w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 09:41:02 -0700
From: Wei Wang <weiwan@...gle.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Samiullah Khawaja <skhawaja@...gle.com>, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, almasrymina@...gle.com,
willemb@...gle.com, jdamato@...tly.com, mkarsten@...terloo.ca,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: stop napi kthreads when THREADED napi is disabled
On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 7:09 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 19 May 2025 22:43:25 +0000 Samiullah Khawaja wrote:
> > -/* Called with irq disabled */
> > -static inline void ____napi_schedule(struct softnet_data *sd,
> > - struct napi_struct *napi)
> > +static inline bool ____try_napi_schedule_threaded(struct softnet_data *sd,
> > + struct napi_struct *napi)
> > {
> > struct task_struct *thread;
> > + unsigned long new, val;
> >
> > - lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
> > + do {
> > + val = READ_ONCE(napi->state);
> > +
> > + if (!(val & NAPIF_STATE_THREADED))
> > + return false;
>
> Do we really need to complicate the fastpath to make the slowpath easy?
>
> Plus I'm not sure it works.
>
> CPU 0 (IRQ) CPU 1 (NAPI thr) CPU 2 (config)
> if (test_bit(NAPI_STATE_SCHED_THREADED))
> ...
>
> ____napi_schedule()
> cmpxchg(...)
> wake_up_process(thread);
> clear_bit(NAPI_STATE_THREADED)
> kthread_stop(thread)
>
> if (kthread_should_stop())
> exit
>
> Right?
>
Hmm right... I think the main issue is that while dev_set_threaded()
clears STATE_THREADED, SCHED_THREADED could already be set meaning the
napi is already scheduled. And napi_thread_wait() does not really
check STATE_THREADED...
> I think the shutting down thread should do this:
>
> while (true) {
> state = READ_ONCE()
>
> // safe to clear if thread owns the NAPI,
> // or NAPI is completely idle
> if (state & SCHED_THREADED || !(state & SCHED)) {
I think we should make sure SCHED_THREADED is cleared as well, or
otherwise the thread is in the middle of calling napi_threaded_poll()
and we can't just disable the thread?
> state &= ~THREADED;
STATE_THREADED to be exact. Right?
> } else {
> msleep(1);
> continue;
> }
>
> if (try_cmpxchg())
> break;
> }
>
> But that's just an idea, it could also be wrong... :S
Powered by blists - more mailing lists