lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1748171710-1375837-5-git-send-email-tariqt@nvidia.com>
Date: Sun, 25 May 2025 14:15:10 +0300
From: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, "Andrew
 Lunn" <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>
CC: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
	Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Moshe Shemesh
	<moshe@...dia.com>, Mark Bloch <mbloch@...dia.com>, Vlad Dogaru
	<vdogaru@...dia.com>, Yevgeny Kliteynik <kliteyn@...dia.com>, Gal Pressman
	<gal@...dia.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 4/4] net/mlx5: HWS, remove incorrect comment

From: Yevgeny Kliteynik <kliteyn@...dia.com>

Removing incorrect comment section that is probably some
copy-paste artifact.

Signed-off-by: Yevgeny Kliteynik <kliteyn@...dia.com>
Reviewed-by: Vlad Dogaru <vdogaru@...dia.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/steering/hws/bwc.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/steering/hws/bwc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/steering/hws/bwc.c
index 9e057f808ea5..665e6e285db5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/steering/hws/bwc.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/steering/hws/bwc.c
@@ -876,8 +876,6 @@ int mlx5hws_bwc_rule_create_simple(struct mlx5hws_bwc_rule *bwc_rule,
 
 	/* At this point the rule wasn't added.
 	 * It could be because there was collision, or some other problem.
-	 * If we don't dive deeper than API, the only thing we know is that
-	 * the status of completion is RTE_FLOW_OP_ERROR.
 	 * Try rehash by size and insert rule again - last chance.
 	 */
 
-- 
2.31.1


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ