netdev - Re: [PATCH 00/18] Split netmem from struct page

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250526011630.GC74632@system.software.com>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 10:16:30 +0900
From: Byungchul Park <byungchul@...com>
To: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
Cc: willy@...radead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	kernel_team@...ynix.com, kuba@...nel.org, almasrymina@...gle.com,
	ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org, harry.yoo@...cle.com, hawk@...nel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, davem@...emloft.net,
	john.fastabend@...il.com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
	asml.silence@...il.com, toke@...hat.com, tariqt@...dia.com,
	edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com, saeedm@...dia.com,
	leon@...nel.org, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
	david@...hat.com, lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com,
	Liam.Howlett@...cle.com, vbabka@...e.cz, rppt@...nel.org,
	surenb@...gle.com, mhocko@...e.com, horms@...nel.org,
	linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
	vishal.moola@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] Split netmem from struct page

On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 10:47:48AM -0700, SeongJae Park wrote:
> Hi Byungchul,
> 
> On Fri, 23 May 2025 12:25:51 +0900 Byungchul Park <byungchul@...com> wrote:
> 
> > The MM subsystem is trying to reduce struct page to a single pointer.
> > The first step towards that is splitting struct page by its individual
> > users, as has already been done with folio and slab.  This patchset does
> > that for netmem which is used for page pools.
> 
> I found checkpatch.pl outputs some complaints to a few patches of this
> patch series.  Most warnings and errors look not critical or even unnecessary,
> but seems some of those would better to be reduced in my opinion.

Thanks for the suggestion.  I will check it.

	Byungchul
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> SJ
> 
> [...]