[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250528171244.188534ec@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 17:12:44 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Gal Pressman <gal@...dia.com>
Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>, Alexei Starovoitov
<ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Jesper Dangaard
Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, Moshe Shemesh
<moshe@...dia.com>, Mark Bloch <mbloch@...dia.com>, Cosmin Ratiu
<cratiu@...dia.com>, Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V2 11/11] net/mlx5e: Support ethtool
tcp-data-split settings
On Wed, 28 May 2025 08:10:46 +0300 Gal Pressman wrote:
> > features = on
> > hw_features = off
> >
> > is how we indicate the feature is "on [fixed]"
> > Tho, I'm not sure how much precedent there is for making things fixed
> > at runtime.
>
> Isn't this something that should be handled through fix_features?
Yes, should work.
Off the top of my head after setting HDS to enabled and trying
to disable HW-GRO we should see: "on [requested off]" right?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists