lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <eb591c65-0106-45f4-9e57-434dac54e923@linux.dev>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2025 13:14:32 +0800
From: Yanteng Si <si.yanteng@...ux.dev>
To: Jitendra Vegiraju <jitendra.vegiraju@...adcom.com>
Cc: "Abhishek Chauhan (ABC)" <quic_abchauha@...cinc.com>,
 Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
 "Russell King (Oracle)" <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com, joabreu@...opsys.com,
 davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
 pabeni@...hat.com, mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com,
 bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, richardcochran@...il.com,
 ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, hawk@...nel.org,
 john.fastabend@...il.com, fancer.lancer@...il.com, ahalaney@...hat.com,
 xiaolei.wang@...driver.com, rohan.g.thomas@...el.com,
 Jianheng.Zhang@...opsys.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
 linux@...linux.org.uk, horms@...nel.org, florian.fainelli@...adcom.com,
 Sagar Cheluvegowda <quic_scheluve@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 0/5] net: stmmac: Add PCI driver support for
 BCM8958x


在 5/29/25 10:56 AM, Jitendra Vegiraju 写道:
> Hi Yanteng,
>
> On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 6:36 PM Yanteng Si <si.yanteng@...ux.dev> wrote:
>> 在 5/28/25 8:04 AM, Abhishek Chauhan (ABC) 写道:
>>>
>>> On 2/7/2025 3:18 PM, Jitendra Vegiraju wrote:
>>>> Hi Abhishek,
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 10:21 AM Abhishek Chauhan (ABC) <
>>>> quic_abchauha@...cinc.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/5/2024 8:12 AM, Jitendra Vegiraju wrote:
>>>>>> Hi netdev team,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 1:53 PM <jitendra.vegiraju@...adcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> From: Jitendra Vegiraju <jitendra.vegiraju@...adcom.com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This patchset adds basic PCI ethernet device driver support for Broadcom
>>>>>>> BCM8958x Automotive Ethernet switch SoC devices.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would like to seek your guidance on how to take this patch series
>>>>> forward.
>>>>>> Thanks to your feedback and Serge's suggestions, we made some forward
>>>>>> progress on this patch series.
>>>>>> Please make any suggestions to enable us to upstream driver support
>>>>>> for BCM8958x.
>>>>> Jitendra,
>>>>>            Have we resent this patch or got it approved ? I dont see any
>>>>> updates after this patch.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Thank you for inquiring about the status of this patch.
>>>> As stmmac driver is going through a maintainer transition, we wanted to
>>>> wait until a new maintainer is identified.
>>>> We would like to send the updated patch as soon as possible.
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Jitendra
>>> Thanks Jitendra, I am sorry but just a follow up.
>>>
>>> Do we know if stmmac maintainer are identified now ?
>> I'm curious why such a precondition is added?
>>
> It's not a precondition. Let me give some context.
> This patch series adds support for a new Hyper DMA(HDMA) MAC from Synopsis.
> Many of the netdev community members reviewed the patches at that time.
> Being the module maintainer at that time, Serge took the initiative to
> guide us through integrating the new MAC into the stmmac driver.
> We addressed all the review comments and submitted the last patch series.
> Without an official maintainer, we didn't get feedback on the last patch series.
> Because of this, we wanted to wait until a new maintainer is assigned
> to this module.
> As Abhishek expressed in his email, it appears the HDMA MAC is
> becoming more mainstream.
> We are hoping to rebase the patch series and resubmit for review if
> netdev team members show interest.


https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20241018205332.525595-1-jitendra.vegiraju@broadcom.com/

In my opinion, the precondition for waiting for a maintainer is that

the patch set has passed the review. I checked lore and did not find

any R&B tags in the patch set, which means your patch set has not

yet met the merging requirements.

Therefore, I think you can continue to push forward with this patch

set and not let it stagnate. I will take some time to review the previous

versions (which may take a while) and hope to be helpful.

Thanks,

Yanteng

> Thanks,
> Jitendra
>> Thanks,
>> Yanteng

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ